← Back to Explore
concept
🕰1 min read
🎵Wisdom Density:
Dense
🧭16 concepts
👁 -- readers
Discipline
🧘 Definition
Discipline in the Berkshire context refers to the emotional and intellectual rigor required to stick to one's investment criteria, particularly during periods of market frenzy.
🧱 Core Pillars
1. Saying "No"
- "The difference between successful people and really successful people is that really successful people say no to almost everything." — 1998 Meeting
- The "called strikes" analogy: waiting for the fat pitch.
2. Underwriting Discipline
- Refusing to write insurance business in GEICO or General Re when pricing is inadequate, even if volume drops.
3. Price Discipline
- Sticking to a Margin of Safety regardless of social pressure to invest.
- References: 1998 Meeting, One-Foot Bars
- Index: index
📚 Historical Mentions & Citations (9)
Click a reference document below to expand and read the exact paragraph(s) containing this concept in the archive.
📜1973 LetterReference Only▼
1973 LetterReference Only
Mentioned in this document.
📜1986 LetterReference Only▼
1986 LetterReference Only
Mentioned in this document.
📜1997 LetterExcerpt Available▼
1997 LetterExcerpt Available
Under these circumstances, we try to exert a Ted Williams kind of discipline. In his book The Science of Hitting, Ted explains that he carved the strike zone into 77 cells, each the size of a baseball. Swinging only at balls in his “best” cell, he knew, would allow him to bat .400; reaching for balls in his “worst” spot, the low outside corner of the strike zone, would reduce him to .230. In other words, waiting for the fat pitch would mean a trip to the Hall of Fame; swinging indiscriminately would mean a ticket to the minors.
Our super-cat business was developed from scratch by Ajit Jain, who has contributed to Berkshire’s success in a variety of other ways as well. Ajit possesses both the discipline to walk away from business that is inadequately priced and the imagination to then find other opportunities. Quite simply, he is one of Berkshire’s major assets. Ajit would have been a star in whatever career he chose; fortunately for us, he enjoys insurance.
📜1999 LetterExcerpt Available▼
1999 LetterExcerpt Available
In Ajit, we have an underwriter equipped with the intelligence to properly rate most risks; the realism to forget about those he can’t evaluate; the courage to write huge policies when the premium is appropriate; and the discipline to reject even the smallest risk when the premium is inadequate. It is rare to find a person possessing any one of these talents. For one person to have them all is remarkable.
Even though a reinsurer may have a tightly focused and rational compensation system, it cannot count on every year coming up roses. Reinsurance is a highly volatile business, and neither General Re nor Ajit’s operation is immune to bad pricing behavior in the industry. But General Re has the distribution , the underwriting skills, the culture, and — with Berkshire’s backing — the financial clout to become the world’s most profitable reinsurance company. Getting there will take time, energy and discipline, but we have no doubt that Ron Ferguson and his crew can make it happen.
📜2001 LetterExcerpt Available▼
2001 LetterExcerpt Available
When property/casualty companies are judged by their cost of float, very few stack up as satisfactory businesses. And interestingly — unlike the situation prevailing in many other industries — neither size nor brand name determines an insurer’s profitability. Indeed, many of the biggest and best-known companies regularly deliver mediocre results. What counts in this business is underwriting discipline. The winners are those that unfailingly stick to three key principles:
In the past I have assured you that General Re was underwriting with discipline — and I have been proven wrong. Though its managers’ intentions were good, the company broke each of the three underwriting rules I set forth in the last section and has paid a huge price for doing so. One obvious cause for its failure is that it did not reserve correctly — more about this in the next section — and therefore severely miscalculated the cost of the product it was selling. Not knowing your costs will cause problems in any business. In long-tail reinsurance, where years of unawareness will promote and prolong severe underpricing, ignorance of true costs is dynamite.
🎙️2003 MeetingExcerpt Available▼
2003 MeetingExcerpt Available
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hi. David Anglin (PH) from St. Louis, Missouri. Thanks for the weekend, it’s very nice. It’s always entertaining here. According to an article in The Economist, the triple-A rating is very important quality for reinsurance to have. Swiss Re, Munich Re have lost their triple-A ratings. Gerling is out of the ballpark. Will the reinsurance business at Berkshire become unintentionally exposed to higher risk because it is now a major reinsurer still holding a triple-A rating, even though it practices a very severe underwriting discipline?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yes. Hello. Paul Tomasik. Thornton, Illinois. Ben Graham and the model of value investing — I’d like to bring the discussion back to that. And what’s interesting and exceptional about you, and Charlie, and Ben Graham, is the selfdiscipline. The incredible self-discipline. And if you look at the model and try to think how to present it to teach others that selfdiscipline, I think you have to make a little tweak to it in two areas. And that’s what I’d like you to comment on. One, intrinsic value. It’s always discussed that you calculate intrinsic value. But in practice, I think you find a number that is guaranteed — 99 percent likely — to be less than intrinsic value. Classic example was in 2000 when you said you’d buy shares back at 45,000. You weren’t saying that Berkshire Hathaway’s intrinsic value was 45,000. You were saying it was significantly more. And anyone who bought it for less than 45,000 is grateful to you. The other area is the hidden assumption in the model.
📜2004 LetterExcerpt Available▼
2004 LetterExcerpt Available
To combat employees’ natural tendency to save their own skins, we have always promised NICO’s workforce that no one will be fired because of declining volume, however severe the contraction. (This is not Donald Trump’s sort of place.) NICO is not labor-intensive, and, as the table suggests, can live with excess overhead. It can’t live, however, with underpriced business and the breakdown in underwriting discipline that accompanies it. An insurance organization that doesn’t care deeply about underwriting at a profit this year is unlikely to care next year either.
Though the hurricanes hit us with a $1.25 billion loss, our reinsurance operations did well last year. At General Re, Joe Brandon has restored a long-admired culture of underwriting discipline that, for a time, had lost its way. The excellent results he realized in 2004 on current business, however, were offset by adverse developments from the years before he took the helm. At NICO’s reinsurance operation, Ajit Jain continues to successfully underwrite huge risks that no other reinsurer is willing or able to accept. Ajit’s value to Berkshire is enormous.
📜2005 LetterExcerpt Available▼
2005 LetterExcerpt Available
• On June 30 we bought Medical Protective Company (“MedPro”), a 106-year-old medical malpractice insurer based in Fort Wayne. Malpractice insurance is tough to underwrite and has proved to be a graveyard for many insurers. MedPro nevertheless should do well. It will have the attitudinal advantage that all Berkshire insurers share, wherein underwriting discipline trumps all other goals. Additionally, as part of Berkshire, MedPro has financial strength far exceeding that of its competitors, a quality assuring doctors that long-to-settle claims will not end up back on their doorstep because their insurer failed. Finally, the company has a smart and energetic CEO, Tim Kenesey, who instinctively thinks like a Berkshire manager.
Upon taking office at Gillette, Jim quickly instilled fiscal discipline, tightened operations and energized marketing, moves that dramatically increased the intrinsic value of the company. Gillette’s merger with P&G then expanded the potential of both companies. For his accomplishments, Jim was paid very well — but he earned every penny. (This is no academic evaluation: As a 9.7% owner of Gillette, Berkshire in effect paid that proportion of his compensation.) Indeed, it’s difficult to overpay the truly extraordinary CEO of a giant enterprise. But this species is rare.
📜2006 LetterReference Only▼
2006 LetterReference Only
Mentioned in this document.